This is an outdated version published on 2025-06-12. Read the most recent version.

Re-thinking the critical incident response (CIR) for police officers involved in ambush situations

Authors

  • Beth Milliard Staff Sergeant, York Regional Police, Aurora, ON, Canada
  • Lara Sigurdson Independent, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
  • Robert Chrismas Independent, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.466

Keywords:

police, ambush, trauma, critical incident, debrief, peer support, mental health

Abstract

Over the past decade, the role and expectations of police officers has undergone significant transformation. Challenges such as social media, societal pressures, officer fatigue, and increasingly sophisticated and lethal criminal activities have made the job more difficult. Specifically, police ambushes and targeted attacks have created a divide between officers and the communities they serve, often resulting in moral injury and mental health issues for officers. From a leadership perspective, ambushes have caused emotional distress, a situation that is becoming more frequent in Canada. The progression in crisis support practices has been slow, with many services still using Critical Incident Stress Debriefing, a program with questionable effectiveness and safety. An alternative strategy involves peer teams that are trained in clinical intervention techniques and have access to an external clinical psychology team. This setup offers peer team members the necessary support and guidance when assisting colleagues in distress. This trauma-informed approach, which considers the needs of individual officers while delivering quick and effective intervention, can reduce the impact of critical incidents on officer mental health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-06-12

Versions

How to Cite

Milliard, B., Sigurdson, L., & Chrismas, R. (2025). Re-thinking the critical incident response (CIR) for police officers involved in ambush situations. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 10(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.466

Issue

Section

Social Innovation Narrative(s)